PART 2
Educational Program on Risk Management Part Two – Slide Presentation
Assessment Description
The purpose of this assignment is to create an educational risk management presentation.
Building upon the outline for an educational session you created in the Educational Program on Risk Management Part One Topic (FALLS AND FALL RELATED INJURIES): Outline of Topic 2 assignment, develop a 12-15 slide PowerPoint presentation that expands in greater detail on how and why your organization should implement your proposed risk management strategy. Incorporate any instructor feedback from the Topic 2 assignment into this presentation and include talking points in the speaker notes section of each slide.
Keep in mind that the PowerPoint is meant to serve as a visual aide to bolster your presentation and is intended to highlight main ideas and key points. Do not use dense blocks of text or more than 7 bullet points of text per slide. However, you may include supplementary images, graphs, and data where relevant.
To successfully complete this assignment, include the following sections as per your outline from Topic 2, though you may include any additional sections as needed:
Introduction
Rationale
Support
Implementation
Challenges
Evaluation
Opportunities
You are required to support your statements with a minimum of six citations from appropriate credible sources.
Refer to the resource, "Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations," located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Educational Program on Risk Management Part Two – Slide Presentation – Rubric
Rubric Criteria
Total
200 points
Criterion
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
3. 3: Satisfactory
4. 4: Good
5. 5: Excellent
Challenges
Challenges
0 points
Challenges slides are not included.
13 points
Challenges slides are present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
15 points
Challenges slides provide minimal detail or support.
17 points
Challenges slides provide appropriate rationale for potential obstacles to the risk management implementation and propose possible solutions.
20 points
Challenges slides are informative and thorough in explaining potential obstacles to the risk management implementation. Slides also provide specific examples of solutions for navigating or preempting predicted obstacles.
Introduction
Introduction
0 points
Introduction slides are not included.
13 points
Introduction slides are present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
15 points
Introduction slides provide minimal detail or support.
17 points
Introduction slides provide appropriate support as to why greater attention to this risk management strategy is needed.
20 points
Introduction slides are informative and thorough in explaining why increased attention to the proposed risk management strategy is needed. Specific examples are provided where appropriate.
Support
Support
0 points
Support data slides are not included.
13 points
Support data slides are present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
15 points
Support data slides provide minimal detail or support.
17 points
Support data slides provide an appropriate explanation of how the data indicate a need for the proposed risk management initiative.
20 points
Support data slides are informative and thorough in showing how the data indicate a need for the proposed risk management initiative. Specific examples are provided where appropriate.
Layout
Layout
0 points
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.
6.5 points
The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
7.5 points
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.
8.5 points
The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
10 points
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
Documentation of Sources
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
0 points
Sources are not documented.
6.5 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent. The information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
7.5 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Research and citations are adequate regarding source, number, and rigor of resources selected. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness.
8.5 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Research and citations are timely and relevant, and address all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
10 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Research and citations are supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Implementation
Implementation
0 points
Implementation slides are not included.
13 points
Implementation slides are present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
15 points
Implementation slides provide minimal detail or support.
17 points
Implementation slides provide appropriate support for how the risk management initiative will be incorporated into the selected health care organization.
20 points
Implementation slides are informative and thorough in explaining the specific actionable steps by which the selected health care organization can implement the proposed risk management initiative.
Presentation of Content
Presentation of Content
0 points
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.
6.5 points
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.
7.5 points
The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.
8.5 points
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.
10 points
The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
0 points
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.
6.5 points
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.
7.5 points
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.
8.5 points
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.
10 points
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Rationale
Rationale
0 points
Rationale slides are not included.
13 points
Rationale slides are present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
15 points
Rationale slides provide minimal detail or support.
17 points
Rationale slides provide appropriate support as to how the proposed risk management strategy is lacking in the selected plan and how its implementation will better meet compliance standards.
20 points
Rationale slides are informative and thorough in explaining why the proposed risk management strategy is lacking in the selected plan. Specific examples are provided as to how its implementation will better meet compliance standards.
Incorporation of Instructor Feedback From Previous Assignment
Incorporation of Instructor Feedback From Previous Assignment
0 points
Incorporation of instructor feedback from previous assignment is not present.
6.5 points
Incorporation of instructor feedback from previous assignment is insufficiently present.
7.5 points
Incorporation of instructor feedback from previous assignment is perfunctory.
8.5 points
Incorporation of instructor feedback from previous assignment is adequate.
10 points
Incorporation of instructor feedback from previous assignment is comprehensive.
Opportunities
Opportunities
0 points
Opportunities slides are not included.
13 points
Opportunities slides are present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
15 points
Opportunities slides provide minimal detail or support.
17 points
Opportunities slides provide an appropriate explanation of additional risk management improvements along with support for the recommended changes.
20 points
Opportunities slides are informative and thorough in providing additional risk management improvements along with detailed support for the recommended changes.
Evaluation Strategy
Evaluation Strategy
0 points
Evaluation strategy slides are not included.
13 points
Evaluation strategy slides are present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
15 points
Evaluation strategy slides provide minimal detail or support.
17 points
Evaluation strategy slides provide an appropriate explanation of how the evaluation plan will assess alignment with the overall goals of the risk management program.
20 points
Evaluation strategy slides are informative and thorough in providing specific examples of how the evaluation plan will assess alignment with the short-term, long-term, and end goals of the risk management program.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
0 points
Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
6.5 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
7.5 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.
8.5 points
Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.
10 points
Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.