Points
165
Rubric
View Rubric: Rubric Criteri: Rubric Criteria
Total
165 points
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Less Than Satisfactory
3. Satisfactory
4. Good
5. Excellent
State-Based Action Coalitions and Their Help in Advancing Goals form IOM Report
State-Based Action Coalitions and Their Help in Advancing Goals form IOM Report
0 points
The role of state-based action coalitions is omitted.
18.56 points
The role of state-based action coalitions is incomplete. It is unclear how these advance the goals in the IOM report.
19.55 points
The role of state-based action coalitions is summarized. A summary of how they help advance the goals in the IOM report is presented.
22.03 points
The role of state-based action coalitions is discussed. A discussion of how they help advance the goals in the IOM report is presented.
24.75 points
The role of state-based action coalitions is thoroughly discussed. A detailed and accurate discussion of how they help advance the goals in the IOM report is presented.
Argument Logic and Construction
Argument Logic and Construction
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
6.19 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
6.52 points
Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
7.34 points
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
8.25 points
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Robert Wood Foundation Committee Work and IOM Report
Robert Wood Foundation Committee Work and IOM Report
0 points
A description of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is omitted.
12.38 points
An incomplete description of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is presented.
13.04 points
A summary of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is presented. There are inaccuracies or misinterpretations.
14.69 points
A description of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is presented. There are slight inaccuracies.
16.5 points
A clear and accurate description of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is presented.
Documentation of Sources
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
0 points
Sources are not documented.
3.71 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
3.91 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
4.41 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
4.95 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
0 points
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
2.47 points
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
2.61 points
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
2.94 points
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3.3 points
All format elements are correct.
Key Messages Transforming Nursing
Key Messages Transforming Nursing
0 points
The four key messages are omitted.
18.56 points
Fewer than four key messages are presented, and the messages contain inaccuracies. An incomplete discussion on how they transformed nursing is presented.
19.55 points
The four key messages that structure the IOM report are generally outlined. A summary of how these transformed some aspects of nursing is presented, but there are some inaccuracies.
22.03 points
The four key messages that structure the IOM report are outlined. A description of how these transformed key aspects of nursing is presented.
24.75 points
The four key messages that structure the IOM report are clearly outlined. A description of how these transformed nursing practice, nursing education and training, nursing leadership, and nursing workforce development are thoroughly discussed.
Barriers to Advancement
Barriers to Advancement
0 points
Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state are omitted. How nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is omitted.
24.75 points
Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state are unclear. How nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is incomplete.
26.07 points
Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state are presented. How nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is summarized. There are inaccuracies, or more information is needed.
29.37 points
Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers are described.
33 points
Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state are thoroughly explored and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers are thoroughly described.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
6.19 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.
6.52 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
7.34 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
8.25 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
State Action Coalition Initiatives Advancing Nursing Profession
State Action Coalition Initiatives Advancing Nursing Profession
0 points
Initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition are omitted.
24.75 points
Only one initiative spearheaded by a state action coalition is presented. The narrative contains omissions and inaccuracies. How these initiatives advance the nursing profession are incomplete.
26.07 points
Two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition are summarized. How these initiatives advance the nursing profession are generally discussed. There are some inaccuracies.
29.37 points
Two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they advance the nursing profession are discussed.
33 points
Two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they advance the nursing profession are thoroughly discussed. The discussion demonstrates a clear understanding of the state action committee and the role in advancing the nursing profession.
Thesis Development and Purpose
Thesis Development and Purpose
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
6.19 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
6.52 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
7.34 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
8.25 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Robert Wood Foundation Committee Work and IOM Report
16.5 points
Key Messages Transforming Nursing
24.75 points
State-Based Action Coalitions and Their Help in Advancing Goals form IOM Report
24.75 points
State Action Coalition Initiatives Advancing Nursing Profession
33 points
Barriers to Advancement
33 points
Thesis Development and Purpose
8.25 points
Argument Logic and Construction
8.25 points
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
8.25 points
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
3.3 points
Documentation of Sources
4.95 points
Total165 points
Status
Upcoming
Assessment Traits
Requires Lopeswrite
Assessment Description
Review the IOM report, "The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health," and explore the "Campaign for Action: State Action Coalition" website. In a 1,000-1,250 word paper, discuss the influence the IOM report and state-based action coalitions have had on nursing practice, nursing education, and nursing workforce development, and how they continue to advance the goals for the nursing profession.
Include the following:
1. Describe the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report, "Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health."
2. Outline the four "Key Messages" that structure the IOM Report recommendations. Explain how these have transformed or influenced nursing practice, nursing education and training, nursing leadership, and nursing workforce development. Provide examples.
3. Discuss the role of state-based action coalitions. Explain how these coalitions help advance the goals specified in the IOM report, "Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health."
4. Research the initiatives on which your state’s action coalition is working. Summarize two initiatives spearheaded by your state’s action coalition. Discuss the ways these initiatives advance the nursing profession.
5. Describe barriers to advancement that currently exist in your state and explain how nursing advocates in your state overcome these barriers.
You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH NURSING TERM PAPERS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT
