Basically this annotated bibliography should reflect what the article says and WHY IT IS A HELP FOR YOU IN YOUR PROJECT. So, in addition to the summary of the article you can discuss things like :
a. Author’s/authors’ credibility or expertise on the subject. A review of the reference list at the end of the article will give you a hint as to whether the author is an expert in the field. For instance – If I wrote an article on psychotherapy in post menopausal women or wounded veterans, you should ask yourself WHY is the Neonatal NP writing on this topic? What is her expertise? I can assure you I have no expertise in the field and you should be wary of any conclusions I would draw.
b. What do you think about the content of the article? Did it help you?
c. Is it clearly written? Is it timely or too old to be of help for you in 2016? Some articles are classics and withstand the test of time but others may be beyond their “shelf life”.
Please pay extra attention to Spelling, Grammar, APA Format in order to not lose points.
Review should be a comprehensive.
Please see the attached article
Preventive Medicine 81 (2015) 438?443
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Preventive Medicine
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ypmed
Impact of the 5As brief counseling on smoking cessation among pregnant
clients of Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants,
and Children (WIC) clinics in Ohio?
Oluwatosin Olaiya a,b,?, Andrea J. Sharma a,c, Van T. Tong a, Deborah Dee a,c, Celia Quinn b,d, Israel T. Agaku b,e,
Elizabeth J. Conrey a,d, Nicole M. Kuiper e, Glen A. Satten a
a
Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
Epidemic Intelligence Service, Division of Applied Sciences, Scienti?c Education and Professional Development Program Of?ce, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
c
U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, Atlanta, GA, USA
d
Ohio Department of Health, Columbus, OH, USA
e
Of?ce on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
b
a r t i c l e
i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Objectives. We assessed whether smoking cessation improved among pregnant smokers who attended
Women, Infants and Children (WIC) Supplemental Nutrition Program clinics trained to implement a brief
smoking cessation counseling intervention, the 5As: ask, advise, assess, assist, arrange.
Methods. In Ohio, staff in 38 WIC clinics were trained to deliver the 5As from 2006 through 2010. Using
2005?2011 Pregnancy Nutrition Surveillance System data, we performed conditional logistic regression,
strati?ed on clinic, to estimate the relationship between women’s exposure to the 5As and the odds of selfreported quitting during pregnancy. Reporting bias for quitting was assessed by examining whether differences
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH NURSING TERM PAPERS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT
