Evaluating the evidence in evidence-based design. Journal of Nursing
nursing10E
Readings
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2012). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for
nursing practice (Laureate Education, Inc., custom ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams &
Wilkins.
Review Chapter 2, Fig. 2.1
Chapter 27, “Systematic Reviews of Research Evidence: Meta-analysis, Metasynthesis, and Mixed
Studies Review”
This chapter focuses on the different types of systematic reviews. The chapter discusses the
advantages of this type of analysis and the steps for conducting a meta-analysis or metasynthesis.
Dingle, P. (2011). Statin statistics: Lies and deception. Positive Health, 180, 1.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
In this article, the author outlines how misleading statistics are used to make false claims about
the positive use of statin drugs in order to retain a market share of sales for pharmaceutical
firms.
Katapodi, M. C., & Northouse, L. L. (2011). Comparative effectiveness research: Using systematic
reviews and meta-analyses to synthesize empirical evidence. Research & Theory for Nursing
Practice, 25(3), 191–209.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
The authors of this article assert that more comparative effectiveness research (CER) is necessary
to accommodate the elevated demand for evidence-based health care practices. The article supplies
a summary of methodological issues relevant to systematic reviews and meta-analyses used in the
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH NURSING TERM PAPERS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT
