Local Implementation of Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention at Five Veterans Health Administration Primary Care Clinics.

Local Implementation of Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention at Five Veterans Health Administration Primary Care Clinics.

Local Implementation of Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention at Five Veterans Health Administration Primary Care Clinics

http://www.journalofsubstanceabusetreatment.com/article/S0740-5472(15)00181-6/fulltext please answer questions : 1. Were the significance and purpose of the study adequately described? 2. Were the interpretations presented descriptively? 3. Were the participants described in detail? a. Was there selection reasonable? b. Was a rationale provided for their selection? 4. Was the study context and location sufficiently described to determine if the findings can be applied to other settings? 5. Was the philosophical or theoretical basis for the study identified? 6. Were the assumptions articulated? Were the assumptions and data collection methods congruent? 7. Was adequate trust established with the participants? Was an open dialogue used to collect the data? 8. Were research questions articulated? Did they explore participants’ experiences and beliefs? 9. Was the data collection process adequately described? 10. Did the researcher spend sufficient time participants to collect data? Was there more than 1 interview? 11. Was a reasonable approach used to gain access to the participants? 12. Was the interviewer’s role during data collection described? Did they indicate their credentials to perform the research? 13. Were participants informed of their rights? Informed consent obtained? Participants’ rights protected? 14. Was the decision trail adequately described? 15. Were enough participant quotes provided to support the findings? 16. Local Implementation of Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention at Five Veterans Health Administration Primary Care Clinics. Were the data sufficiently rich to support the conclusions? Were the findings validated by data? Did the participants describe specific examples of the phenomenon being studied? 17. Do the categories or themes provide a whole picture? 18. Were the findings returned to participants or experts in the area? 19. Did two or more researchers participate in data analysis? How were differences of opinion resolved? 20. Was the philosophical or theoretical basis of the study consistent with the study assumptions, data collection process, and analysis and interpretative methods used? Were citations provided for the philosophy/theory? 21. Are the findings consistent with common meanings or experiences? 22. Did the researcher adequately examine the existing knowledge? 23. Did the researcher compare and contrast the findings with those of other studies 24. Are the findings relevant? Provide new knowledge? Have implications for related cases? 25. Are suggestions for further research identified? 26. What did you think of the study? How would2 you have changed/improved the study?

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH NURSING TERM PAPERS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT