critique the attached file using the “General Method” work to prepare and plan for a policy brief. In a separate document, answer the following questions substantively – these are not yes/no questions – provide useful feedback for the reader to use to improve their work, including where necessary looking up information you think is missing, and providing suggestions for improvement.
1. After reviewing STEP 1 (Prepare) of the General Method section, is there a strong introductory paragraph on the problem and related policies? Does the writing indicate adequate preparation for coming up with a plan? Why or why not?
2. After reviewing STEP 2 (Plan) of the General Method section, answer the following questions.
1. Does the plan address a specific audience about a specific problem? Who do you think the audience is after reading the plan?
2. Does it have a purpose related to a specific policy action? What is the policy action?
3. Does it approach the issue accurately and ethically? What evidence is presented to show you so?
4. Is the planned form and expressions appropriate?
5. Will it be designed for use by the reader? As the reader, what would you expect to be able to use it for?
6. Does the plan have clarity? Why or why not?
7. Does it seem correct? Is there a plan for evidence, data, and research to prove the point?
8. Is it concise?
9. Does it seem credible? Why or why not?
10. Additional Comments for the author?
concisely critique the development of a policy brief in relation to its policy relevance in an organized and coherent manner.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH NURSING TERM PAPERS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT
