In this Module, the student will create a quality improvement (QI) plan. This plan will continue in Module seven. Here, the components of this QI plan include the development of:
Problem, Gap & Best Practice
Ensure you carefully follow the attached directions.
Recommended Changes
Ensure you carefully follow the attached directions.
Change Theory & Cultural Competency;
Ensure you carefully follow the attached directions.
Teams, Aims, and Measures.
Ensure you carefully follow the attached directions,
This paper is automatically submitted to Turnitin. It is important for the student to understand that Turnitin checks the paper for plagiarism. After submitting the paper in this module, Turnitin will provide the student with an originality score. If the score is close to 30% or below, this submission will count as the one the instructor reviews. If the score is much higher than 30%, the student needs to review the highlighted areas and paraphrase. The best practice is to select the areas where there is an abundance of highlights. Next, the student should resubmit the paper in the module.
This assignment only allows for two submissions.
This section of the QI project is worth a total of 300 points and will be graded using the QI Proposal Sections A, B C & D rubric. Please carefully review the attached directions. Ensure your paper is in proper APA format and contains scholarly references
Submission: To submit your file, choose the submission button and upload your file.
After sections A, B, C and D are submitted, the instructor will make comments and return the paper to the student. The final version of the Capstone project should be submitted in Module 7.
Grading: This proposal is worth 300 points toward your final grade and will be graded using the rubric titled QI Proposal Sections A, B, C and D. Please use it as a guide for the successful completion of this assignment.
Please ensure you carefully review the attached directions. If you do not understand something, feel free to reach out to the instructor.
OR
This semester, you have the option to do this assignment as a presentation (along with Module 7) in a virtual exchange activity on 4/28/22 from 10:00-12:00 pm. If you do the presentation, you do not need to submit this assignment as a paper. Space is limited, if you would like to sign up, please contact Dr. Kramer by 4/1/22 or email theresa.dyerkramer@fscj.edu.
Rubric
Quality Improvement Proposal A,B,C, D, updated 021619
Quality Improvement Proposal A,B,C, D, updated 021619
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProblem and Significance
60 pts
Expert
Provides clear, explicit, and detailed answers to the magnitude of the problem, need for improvement.
50 pts
Competent
The answers to the specific questions in the Quality Improvement Proposal are less clear or lack strong support from the literature.
42 pts
Developing
Provides vague answers to the project questions posed in the Quality Improvement Proposal. Some of the answers may be missing.
0 pts
Not Acceptable
Provides an unclear response to the project questions posed in the Quality Improvement Proposal, without solid information from the literature. Many of the answers are missing.
60 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecommended Changes
60 pts
Expert
Provides clear, explicit, and detailed answers to the project questions posed in the Quality Improvement Proposal, with solid evidence from the literature
50 pts
Competent
The answers to the specific questions in the Quality Improvement Proposal are less clear or lack strong support from the literature.
42 pts
Developing
Provides vague answers to the project questions posed in the Quality Improvement Proposal. Some of the answers may be missing.
0 pts
Not Acceptable
Provides an unclear response to the project questions posed in the Quality Improvement Proposal, without solid information from the literature. Many of the answers are missing.
60 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeChange Theory
60 pts
Expert
Provides clear, explicit, and detailed answers to the project questions posed in the Quality Improvement Proposal, with solid evidence from the literature as appropriate.
50 pts
Competent
The answers to the specific questions in the Quality Improvement Proposal are less clear or lack strong support from the literature.
42 pts
Developing
Provides vague answers to the project questions posed in the Quality Improvement Proposal. Some of the answers may be missing.
0 pts
Not Acceptable
Provides an unclear response to the project questions posed in the Quality Improvement Proposal, without solid information from the literature. Many of the answers are missing.
60 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTeams, Aims & Measures
60 pts
Expert
Provides clear, explicit, and detailed answers to the project questions posed in the Quality Improvement Proposal, with solid evidence from the literature as appropriate.
50 pts
Competent
The answers to the specific questions in the Quality Improvement Proposal are less clear or lack strong support from the literature.
42 pts
Developing
Provides vague answers to the project questions posed in the Quality Improvement Proposal. Some of the answers may be missing.
0 pts
Non Acceptable
Provides an unclear response to the project questions posed in the Quality Improvement Proposal, without solid information from the literature. Many of the answers are missing.
60 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA, formatting & grammar
60 pts
Expert
Paper follows all APA formatting conventions along with appropriate grammar
50 pts
Competent
Paper follows most of the APA formatting conventions along with 3-5 grammar errors
42 pts
Developing
Paper follows some of the APA formatting conventions and there are 5-7 grammar errors
0 pts
Not Acceptable
Paper does not follow many of the APA formatting conventions and there are more than 7 grammar errors
60 pts
Total Points: 300
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH NURSING TERM PAPERS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT
