: Polycystic ovarian syndrome is the most common endocrinopathy among reproductive age women can cause long-term reproductive and metabolic consequences, including but not limited to infertility, heart disease, diabetes and obesity. In the majority of cases insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia seem to have an important role in the etiology. The aim of this research was to review the role of Metformin in improving fertility outcomes as a standalone treatment or with the use of Clomiphene.
: Databases were searched for articles that included more than 20 subjects, I English, published from 1980-present with selected keywords: polycystic ovarian syndrome or polycystic ovarian disease or polycystic ovary syndrome or PCOS or infertility AND Metformin AND Clomiphene. The selection process was process has been presented in PRISMA flow chart. A total of
articles were found were found,
met criteria and were analyzed.
: Data was summarized and presented in form of a table. Relevant information taken from each article included: title, author(s), location, year, study design, sample size, diagnosis of polycystic ovarian syndrome criteria, intervention, ovulation measurement methods, pregnancy measurement and conclusion. Most studies support that Metformin and Clomiphene treatment increased ovulation statistically significant.
: This systematic review has broadened the understanding of the use of Metformin in treating infertility in patients with PCOS alone and with the use of Clomiphene. Suggesting the role of insulin resistance on PCOS etiology and the addition of Metformin to treatment protocols to better outcomes of fertility in terms of ovulation. More research and studies are needed to evaluate whether Metformin addition will provide a statistically significant benefit on live birth rates and pregnancy.
polycystic ovarian syndrome or polycystic ovarian disease or polycystic ovary syndrome or PCOS or infertility AND Metformin AND Clomiphene
Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrinopathy among reproductive age women and leading cause of WHO Type 2 anovulatory infertility
. The condition, which is associated with absence of ovulation, high androgens or cysts on the ovaries, has also long term reproductive and metabolic consequences.
The criteria to diagnose PCOS is varied due to the wide-ranging features of the syndrome and the lack of accepted underlying etiologies
. At the US National Institutes of Health Conference in 1990, three key features were agreed upon; oligomenorrhoea, hyperandrogenism (clinical or biochemical) and absence of other endocrine disorders (congenital adrenal hyperplasia, thyroid dysfunction and androgen-secreting tumors
). The following diagnostic criteria’s have been review by Nathan et al. (2014) and are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1: Diagnostic Criteria for PCOS
Rotterdam Criteria 2003
NIH Criteria 1990
Androgen Excess and Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Society guidelines (2009)
|Criteria||Requires 2/3 of:Hyperandrogenism* (clinical or biochemical)
Chronic Anovulation / Oligoovulation
PCO on ultrasound
|Hyperandrogenism* (clinical or biochemical)
Chronic Anovulation / Oligoovulation
PCO not necessary for diagnosis
|Diagnosis needs hyperandrogenism plus one other feature:Hyperandrogenism *(clinical or biochemical)
Chronic Anovulation / Oligoovulation
PCO on ultrasound
Clinical features can range from chronic anovulation, ovulatory infertility, heart disease, obesity and androgen-related symptoms. PCOS may also be associated with an increased risk of developing Type II diabetes mellitus, the metabolic syndrome and endometrial cancer
. Endometrial cancer can be a result of endometrial hyperplasia that stems from chronic anovulation
The primary etiology of PCOS remains unclear. Although most attribute the excess androgen synthesis and symptoms of the disease due to a defect in ovarian cells
, genetic and environmental factors both have implications in its development. Stein and Leventhal placed emphasis on the high ratio of luteinizing hormone (LH) to follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)
. Other underlying causes have been identified such as increased frequency of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulses that stimulate theca cells to produce androgen, decreased levels of FSH, insulin resistance via a post-receptor defect in fat tissue and skeletal muscles, pancreatic beta-cell dysfunction and obesity
Obesity plays an important role in the pathogenesis of PCOS through its contribution to insulin resistance. Obesity also increases menstrual disorders and hyperandrogenism, while weight loss helps alleviates symptoms. Weight gain in women with PCOS can exacerbate insulin resistance, leading to development of metabolic syndrome, acanthosis nigricans and ultimately T2DM.
Achard and Thiers first described a disorder of carbohydrate metabolism and hyperandrogenism in “diabéte des femmes à barbes”, diabetes of bearded women in 1921
. Since the initial report by Burghen et al
(5) in 1980 that PCOS is associated with hyperinsulinemia it is clear that insulin has a major role on reproductive morbidities. The relationship of insulin on gonadal function has been investigated extensively by Dunaif et al 1988
, Barbieri et al 1983
, Poretsky et al 1987
Insulin has varying effects on the gonadal / reproductive system mechanism which leads to dysfunction activity in the ovaries and menstruation. Hyperinsulinemia secondary to insulin resistance leads to an increased ovarian response to gonadotropins that results in overexpression of LH and IGF-1 receptors
. Insulin also exerts its effects by increasing the sensitivity of immature granulosa cells to LH, proliferation of thecal cells and up regulation of enzymes related to androgen synthesis
. Insulin also reduces the synthesis of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG). Decreased levels of SHBG results increased bioavailability of testosterone to peripheral tissues
. Hyperinsulinemia also up regulates the activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, which results in excess androgen production from the adrenal glands
. The role of insulin resistance in PCOS is most promising considering the possibility therapeutic intervention with insulin sensitizing agents.
Lifestyle change is considered first-line treatment for infertility in women with PCOS. A 5 to 10% loss in body weight regardless of BMI may be associated with improvement in central obesity, hyperandrogenism and ovulation rate
. First line pharmacological treatment for improving fertility is Clomiphene citrate (CC), an estrogen receptor modulator
. Advantages include low cost, oral administration and few side effects. Approximately 15% of women with PCOS do not respond to the maximum dose of CC and are considered resistant to this medication
. Second-line pharmacological treatment of anovulation in women with PCOS includes use of gonadotropins [recombinant follicle stimulating hormone or human menopausal gonadotropin] for timed intercourse of intrauterine insemination
. The cost of this treatment is higher compared to others and it is necessary to undergo tubal patency testing prior to treatment. More invasive therapeutic modalities include laparoscopic ovarian drilling surgery, which has higher cost, requires general anesthesia and greater complications and in vitro fertilization
While first line should always be lifestyle changes, weight loss and decreasing circulating insulin levels has a promising effect on ovulation. Metformin is a widely prescribed oral agent approved for use in the treatment of Type II diabetes mellitus. A biguanide medication whose mechanism is to increase sensitivity to insulin, Metformin has been shown to improve hyperandrogenemia and hirsutism and reduce lipid levels in PCOS
. Some studies have shown that in women with PCOS, treatment with Metformin improved insulin resistance and increased the likelihood of ovulation and pregnancy, with and sometimes without Clomiphene
. The exact role of Metformin in the treatment of women with PCOS and its effects on fertility including ovulation and live birth rate is still unclear.
This paper aims to review the role of Metformin in improving fertility outcomes as standalone treatment or with the use of Clomiphene.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis flow diagram was used to present the search strategy (Fig.1). PubMed, NEJM were used to search for articles published from 1980 to present day. The following key words were searched; polycystic ovarian syndrome or polycystic ovarian disease or polycystic ovary syndrome or PCOS or infertility AND Metformin AND Clomiphene. A manual search was conducted from reference lists. Total articles found were
from database and
from manual search. After removal of duplicate literature,
remained. Those abstracts were reviewed. Articles were then excluded due to non-relevance, non-English language, opinion based, and case studies, gray-literature. The remaining 19 articles were reviewed in full.
Figure 1: PRISMA
Records identified through database searching
Additional records identified through other sources
Total Records Identified
Removal of Duplicates
Records screened by title and abstract
Records excluded based on:
Non-English, not relevant, opinion based, gray-area, case studies, participants<20
Full-text articles assessed for eligibility
Full-text articles excluded, with reasons
Not RCT, another comparison, relevant data could not be retrieved
(n = 7 )
Studies included in analysis
Full Text articles were further evaluated and narrowed based on study type, number of subjects, relevance of research and type of outcome. Only primary research articles with greater than 20 subjects written in English in the last twenty years were chosen. 7 articles were excluded due to reasons of having another comparison or relevant data could not be extracted. Considered studies evaluated the relationship of Metformin and Clomiphene treatment on conception and pregnancy. Included studies described criteria for PCOS diagnosis. Valid exclusion of secondary causes like thyroid dysfunction, congenital adrenal hyperplasia, hyperprolactinemia, and androgen-secreting tumors was expected. Exclusion of females with history of pelvic inflammatory disease or tubal disease and male factors (sperm quality) was expected. A diagnosis of PCOS must have been established using any of the following accepted methods: Rotterdam Criteria, ESHRE/ASRM Criteria or presence of irregular menstrual cycles, elevated plasma levels of testosterone, clinical symptoms of hyperandrogenism and presence of polycystic ovaries verified by transvaginal ultrasonography. No mandatory outcomes measures of pregnancy were required. The data was then extracted from remaining 12 articles into a table (Table 2). Information taken from each article included: Title, Author, Location, Year, Study Design, Sample size, Diagnosis of polycystic ovarian syndrome criteria, intervention, ovulation measurement methods, pregnancy measurement and conclusion
The population comprised of women of childbearing age with PCOS. In all of the studies, the number of participants and the criteria used to diagnose PCOS was recorded.
The effect of intervention on ovulation, and pregnancy was noted. The criteria for measuring ovulation and pregnancy were also recorded in the chart.
Table 2: Main Characteristics and Summary of Studies Included
Efficacy of combined Metformin–Clomiphene citrate in comparison with Clomiphene citrate alone in infertile women with
polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS)
|Ayaz et Al||Makkah, Saudi Arabia||2013||Randomized controlled trial||42||2 of the following:
1. Polycystic ovaries (either 12 or more peripheral follicles or increased ovarian volume (greater than 10 cm
2. oligo- or anovulation (irregular cycles, amenorrhea)
3. clinical and/or biochemical signs of hyperandrogenism (Acne, hirsutism, voice changes, clitoromegaly)
|Group A:Metformin + CC
Group B: CC alone
|Evidence of ovulation as detected by follicle tracking (ovarian volume, size in mm and number of follicles) on ultrasonography||Confirmation of Conception was done by positive urine pregnancy test in those women who did not menstruate. Clinical pregnancy was confirmed by gestational sac detection on ultrasonography.||A combination of Metformin and Clomiphene citrate significantly regulated the menstrual cycle and increased the ovulation and conception rates in study patients without complications; so, we prefer this combination therapy as first line therapy.|
PCOSMIC: a multi-centre randomized trial in women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome evaluating Metformin for Infertility with Clomiphene
|Johnson et al||Auckland, New Zealand||2009||double blind multi-centre randomized trial||171||Rotterdam consensus criteria||Women with high BMI>32kg/m2 received placebo or Metformin; women with bmi <or equal to 32kg/m2 received CC, Metformin or both||confirmed if pregnancy occurred or if serum progesterone level was > or equal to 25 nmol/l or suggested by serum progesterone 15-25 nmol/l||positive urine or serum pregnancy test plus intrauterine gestation sac on ultrasound scan or histological evidence of trophoblastic tissue with spontaneous abortion or ectopic pregnancy, live birth||There is no evidence that adding Metformin to ‘standard care’ is beneficial. Pregnancy and live birth rates are low in women with BMI>32 kg/m
whatever treatment is used, with no evidence of benefit of Metformin over placebo. For women with BMI ≤ 32 kg/m
there is no evidence of significant differences in outcomes whether treated with Metformin, CC or both.
Clomiphene citrate, Metformin or a combination of both as the first line ovulation induction drug for Asian Indian women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: A randomized controlled trial
|Kar et al||Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India||2015||randomized controlled trial||105||Rotterdam criteria: least two of the three following criteria: (1) Chronic anovulation; (2) the clinical or biochemical hyperandrogenemia; (3) polycystic ovarian morphology.||Group I : CCGroup II Metformin Group III CC + Metformin||Transvaginal sonography||fetal cardiac activity documented at 6 weeks of pregnancy, primary outcome measured was live birth rate. Secondary outcomes were ovulation rate, pregnancy rate and early pregnancy loss.||Metformin was as good as CC in terms of “LBR” and the combination of CC and Metformin gave the highest ovulation and LBR.|
Clomiphene, Metformin, or Both for Infertility in the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
|Legro et al||United States of America||2007||RCT||626||oligomenorrhea (with a history of no more than 8 spontaneous menses per year) and hyperandrogenemia (with an elevated testosterone level documented within the previous year in an outpatient setting on the basis
of local laboratory results, with a predetermined cutoff level set by the principal investigator at each study site)
|Group 1: CC plus placeboGroup 2: extended-release Metformin plus placebo, Group 3: a combination of Metformin and Clomiphene for up to 6 months.||progesterone level above 5 ng per milliliter during a cycle||urinary pregnancy test, ultrasonography for fetal viability. Live birth rate was primary outcome. Secondary outcome were rate of pregnancy loss, singleton birth and ovulation||Clomiphene is superior to Metformin in achieving live birth in infertile women with the polycystic ovary syndrome, although multiple births are a complication. The rate of ovulation was significantly higher in the combination group than in either of the single- agent groups|
Effects of Metformin treatment on luteal phase progesterone concentration in polycystic ovary syndrome
|Meenakumari et al||Banaras, India||2003||Randomized controlled trial||24||criteria of the 1990 National Institutes of Health Conference. These include oligomenorrhea, hyperandrogenism, presence of 8 or more cystic follicles (about 10 mm in diameter) on ultrasound||i) natural cycle No treatment was given. ii) CCiii) Metformin plus CC||ovulation documented by ultrasound was later confirmed by serum progesterone levels||The deficiency of luteal phase progesterone synthesis and/or action is the leading cause of infertility or spontaneous abortion in cases of luteal phase defect. Venous blood (~5 ml) was collected between 8:00 and 10:00 am after an overnight fast during the follicular and luteal phase of the cycle.||a significant enhancement in luteal progesterone concentration (16.97 ng/ml) in PCOS women treated with Metformin.|
Effect of Clomiphene citrate plus Metformin and Clomiphene citrate plus placebo on induction of ovulation in women with newly diagnosed polycystic ovary syndrome: randomized double blind clinical trial
|Moll e al||Netherlands||2006||randomized double blind clinical trial||228||Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM consensus||i) CC plus Metforminii) CC plus placebo||Ovulation was detected either with a biphasic basal temperature curve, a follicle with a diameter ≥ 16 mm on transvaginal ultrasonography, or progesterone ≥14 nmol/l in the second half of a menstrual cycle, or pregnancy||pregnancy test||We cannot exclude the possibility that addition of Metformin may lead to an increase in the ovulation rate of up to 5%, though whether such a small difference is clinically relevant is doubtful. Though Metformin seems to be a relatively safe medication, it is associated with a high incidence of side effects.18 We conclude that Metformin should not be added to CC as primary method for induction of ovulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.|
Effects Of Metformin On Spontaneous And Clomiphene-Induced Ovulation In The Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
|Nestler et al||United States, Venezuela, and Italy.||1998||Randomized controlled trial||61||All had oligomenorrhea (fewer than six menstrual periods in the preceding year) and hyperandrogenemia (elevated serum free testosterone concentrations, determined at local clinics), All the women had findings on ultra- sonography of the ovaries consistent with the diagnosis of the polycystic ovary syndrome.||Group 1: MetforminGroup 2: Placebo||serum progesterone, ovulation presumed if value exceeded 8 ng per milliliter||not measured||The ovulatory response to Clomiphene can be increased in obese women with the polycystic ovary syndrome by decreasing insulin secretion with Metformin.|
Comparison of Clomiphene citrate, Metformin, or the combination of both for first-line ovulation induction and achievement of pregnancy in 154 women with polycystic ovary syndrome
|Neveu et al||Quebec, Canada||2006||observational comparative study||154||oligoanovulation (as defined by less than 9 menstrual periods per year) and either clinical or biochemical evidence of hyperandrogenism.||Group 1 : CCGroup 2 : Metformin
Group 3 : CC & Metformin
|biphasic basal body temperature curve and/or a progesterone level in the luteal phase of at least 2.0 ng/mL (6.0 mmol/L) during their follow-up. Some women also added the LH urinary detection method for their assessment of ovulation||positive beta -hCG||Metformin is better for ovulation induction than CC alone and equivalent for pregnancy achievement. We suggest that Metformin can be used first for ovulation induction in patients with PCOS regardless of their weight and insulin levels because of its efficacy and known safety profile|
Prospective Parallel Randomized, Double-Blind, Double- Dummy Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Clomiphene Citrate and Metformin as the First-Line Treatment for Ovulation Induction in Nonobese Anovulatory Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
|Palomba et al||Catanzaro, Italy.||2005||Prospective Parallel Randomized, Double-Blind, Double- Dummy Controlled Clinical Trial||100||National Institutes of Health criteria||Group A: Metformin + placebo Group B: placebo plus CC.||transvaginal sonography and ovulation was retrospectively defined with the observation of a decrease in follicular dimensions and liquid in the cul-de-sac and confirmed by plasma P assay greater than 10 ng/ml (SI 32 nmol/liter).||rising beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and the sonographic evidence of intrauterine gestational sac||Six-month Metformin administration is significantly more effective than six-cycle CC treatment in improving fertility in anovulatory nonobese PCOS women|
Evaluating the equivalence of Clomiphene citrate with and without Metformin in ovulation induction in PCOS patients
|Siebert et al||Cape Town , South Africa||2009||Prospective randomized controlled study||107||Rotterdam consensus||Group A: pretreated with Metformin before ClomipheneGroup B received Clomiphene without pre-treatment||the ovulation rate achieved in women in the M+C/C arm was 34/52 (65.4%) compared to 36/55 (65.5%) in the C/C arm. The treatment effect ((M+C/C) – C/C) is 0% with 95% confidence interval of −18.1% to 18%. The per protocolovulation results were 34/42 (81%) in the M+C/C arm compared to 36/48 (75%) in the C/C arm. The ovulation rate difference was 6% with 95% confidence interval −11% to 22%. In a comparison of successful ovulating versus non- ovulating women from the trial the following were significant baseline determinants: lower median weight in the ovulating group (77 kg versus 86 kg, p=.021), lower median bmi (29.0 versus 32.9, p=.009), lower median DHEAS at baseline (4.6 compared to 7.0, p=.049), lower median 17OH-progesterone (2.2 versus 4.6, p=.027) and higher baseline median SHBG ( 37.8 compared to 28.5, p=.036).||Although identical ovulation rates were observed in both arms equivalence could not be concluded with respect to the specified criteria.|
Clomiphene Citrate Versus Metformin as First-Line Approach for the Treatment of Anovulation in Infertile Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
|Palomba et al||Naples, Italy||2007||multicenter, nonrandomized, prospective, controlled study.||80||presence of clinical [Ferriman-Gallwey score 8] or biochemical hyperandrogenism [se- rum testosterone levels 2 sd above our reference mean values] and chronic anovulation [serum luteal progesterone (P) 2 ng/ml)].||Group 1: MetforminGroup 2: CC||Reproductive outcomes were measured.||6-month course of 1700 mg/d Metformin treatment and CC administered in an escalation protocol are two effective first- line approaches for improving fertility in anovulatory PCOS women|
An assessment of lifestyle modification versus medical treatment with Clomiphene citrate, Metformin, and Clomiphene citrate–Metformin in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome
|Mohammad Ali Karimzadeh and Mojgan Javedani||Yazd, Iran||2009||Prospective randomized double-blind study||343||European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine guidelines (Rotterdam criteria, 2003)||Group 1: CCGroup 2: Metformin
Group 3: Clomiphene + Metformin
Group 4: Lifestyle modification
|Transvaginal sonography and follicular tracking were done||beta-hcg, ultrasound detection of fetal heart||The clinical pregnancy rate was 12.2% in Clomiphene group, 14.4% in Metformin group, 14.8% in Clomiphene + Metformin group, and 20% in lifestyle modification group. Lifestyle modification group achieved a significant reduction in waist circumference, total androgen, and lipid profile.Conclusion(s)
Lifestyle modification improves the lipid profile in PCOS patients. Therefore, lifestyle modification may be used as the first line of ovulation induction in PCOS patients.
Although PCOS is the most common endocrinopathy among reproductive age women, the current treatment regimens and management depends on the symptoms. For women who want infertility treatment, Clomiphene citrate is still the first line treatment. Clomiphene citrate, an estrogen receptor modulator, acts directly on the hypothalamic-pituitary axis to help induce ovulation. Multiple pregnancy rates are under 10% and hyper stimulation syndrome is rare
. Some patients have reported CC resistance or failure.
Given the strong data that support the pathogenesis that hyperinsulinemia plays in PCOS, it is reasonable to opt for insulin lowering medications as treatment. Metformin is a biguanide that is approved for treatment of Type 2 Diabetes. Its mechanism of action is to inhibit hepatic glucose production, although it also decreases intestinal glucose absorption and promotes insulin sensitivity in peripheral tissues
. The metabolic benefits have been show to decrease weight loss and improve insulin resistance, which helps alleviate symptoms of PCOS. Metformin has shown in PCOS to improve menstrual regularity, ovulation and reducing androgenemia
. Side effects that are most commonly experience include diarrhea and nausea. In patients with kidney disease, congestive heart failure and sepsis, lactic acidosis is a concern. Although there was concern of teratogenicity if used during pregnancy, recent data supports no major birth defects with no effect on motor and social development
The purpose of this review was to compare Metformin in improving fertility outcomes as standalone treatment or with the use of Clomiphene. Outcomes measured include ovulation, pregnancy rate and live birth rate.
Nestler et al
was one of the first studies to evaluate the use of Metformin and Clomiphene on ovulation. Nineteen of the 21 women who received combined Metformin and Clomiphene ovulated; while only 2 of the 25 women in the group given placebo and Clomiphene ovulated (
<0.001). They concluded that the ovulatory response to Clomiphene can be increased in obese women with PCOS by decreasing insulin levels with Metformin vs. placebo. This suggests that hyperinsulinemia impedes ovulation in obese women with PCOS.
Ayaz et al
found that ovulatory response was higher in Group A (Metformin & Clomiphene group) vs. Group B (group with Clomiphene and placebo). Group A similarly had more conception by confirmation of urine pregnancy test (66.6% vs. 28.6%,
=0.01) and presence of gestational sac on ultrasound (61.9% vs. 28.6%,
=0.03). They concluded that a combination of Metformin and Clomiphene significantly increased ovulation and conception rate without complication and would be preferred as first line therapy.
Kar et al
found that Metformin is as efficient as Clomiphene on live birth rates. Combined Clomiphene and Metformin had statistically significantly higher ovulation rate as compared to CC alone
=0.03; odds ratio: 95% confidence interval: 3.888 [1.08–13.997]). No difference in ovulation was found between Metformin only group and Clomiphene only group (
Karimzadeh et al
found that clinical pregnancy rates between Metformin alone, Clomiphene alone, Metformin-Clomiphene, lifestyle change showed no significant difference from another (
=.56) and reported that all 3 groups had an increase in live birth rates.
Neveu et al
found that Metformin is better for ovulation induction than CC alone 75.4% vs. 50%;
=.005). Weight loss was comparable between the three groups, therefore efficacy of Metformin is not just due to weight loss alone.
Legro et al
found that the rate of live birth was lower in Metformin group than in the Clomiphene group and the combination-therapy group (
<0.001). The rate of ovulation was higher in the combination of Metformin-Clomiphene group than any other group. However difference of ovulation did not translate into an increase for live-birth rate. They did find that the Metformin group had a significant decrease in BMI and total testosterone, and an increase in sex hormone-binding globulin levels. Similarly the Clomiphene and Metformin group showed similar changes. This study in comparison to others measured live birth rate for primary outcomes. Although they found no significant benefit of the Metformin-Clomiphene combination, the possibility of some benefit cannot be excluded. When ovulation was used as the primary outcome, the combination of Metformin-Clomiphene was superior to either Clomiphene alone or Metformin alone. Also some of their subjects had a long-standing history of infertility.
Palomba et al
compared efficacy of Metformin vs. Clomiphene as first line treatment for treating anovulation in PCOS patients. They found that both CC and Metformin are two effective-first line options even if the efficacy of theses approaches has a different proceeding over time, Metformin was higher after 6 month treatment. No significant differences between the experimental and control groups were observed in ovulation (55.4 vs. 59.8%, respectively;
=0.396), pregnancy (10.8 vs. 11.2%, respectively;
=0.888), and abortion (19.5 vs. 26.3%, respectively;
= 0.530) rates. This differed from their earlier study that showed that Metformin had significant advantages in comparison with CC in terms of pregnancy (Palomba et al, 2005
). They found that in the earlier study, the study population was composed of only nonobese patients and subjects screened for diabetes and/or glucose intolerance which is not representative of PCOS population.
Meenakumari et al
found that women treated with Metformin demonstrated a significant enhancement in luteal progesterone concentrations compared to women on a natural cycle and women treated with only Clomiphene citrate. The deficiency of luteal phase progesterone synthesis and/or action is the leading cause of infertility or spontaneous abortion in cases of luteal phase defect, resulting in pregnancy loss.
This study measured luteal progesterone as final outcome but it is unsure if this related to successful pregnancy.
In contrast, Johnson et al
found no evidence that adding Metformin to standard care is beneficial on improving pregnancy and live birth rates in women with PCOS. The main weakness was that the trial was insufficiently powered. In order to detect an increase in live birth rate, 590 participants would have been required (as opposed to 136).
Moll et al
similarly also found that Metformin is not an effective addition to Clomiphene citrate at inducing ovulation when compared to Clomiphene-placebo group. The ovulation rate in the Metformin group was 64% compared with 72% in the placebo group, a non-significant difference (risk difference − 8%, 95% confidence interval − 20% to 4% ). They found an increase in ovulation with Clomiphene and Metformin of 5% but whether a small difference is clinically relevant is doubtful. Their study examined patients for a total of 6 ovulations or until Clomiphene resistance developed, the downside being the unexpectedly high rate of dropouts, which was not accounted for in power calculation.
Siebert et al
found that although identical ovulation rates were observed between patients treated with pretreatment with Metformin and Clomiphene and Clomiphene citrate only, equivalence could not be concluded. Not using a placebo for the pretreatment in the Clomiphene citrate group only and their sample size limited this study.
Many variables exist within the study that explains the conflicting findings of the efficacy of Metformin. While the review has shown that most of the studies agree that Metformin and Clomiphene are superior in respect to ovulation rates. Whether Metformin and Clomiphene are superior to Clomiphene treatment alone on pregnancy and live birth rates remains to be unclear. Most studies seem to support the use of Metformin for anovulatory PCOS patients, to help with ovulation. When the primary outcome measurement was ovulation, adding Metformin showed a significant benefit. When the primary outcome measurement was pregnancy or live birth rate, the benefit was not statistically significant. In the most recent studies did they start to measure outcomes such as pregnancy, live birth and pregnancy complications.
The roles of Metformin in obese and nonobese women with PCOS were similar in data. In some studies, weight loss achieved by lifestyle changes, also provided a statistically significant effect on ovulatory rates. Ultimately there is a correlation between improving insulin resistance and androgens levels, and ovulation rates.
Most studies reported that subjects experienced side effects limited to gastrointestinal symptoms. While Metformin is known to cause lactic acidosis in patients with renal/hepatic impairment and cardiac disease, none of the studies reported any incidence of lactic acidosis.
Another area was the power of the study and the sample size which varied from study to study. Most studies that followed the patients for a longer period of time experienced patient dropout rates. One study supported that the benefit of Metformin and Clomiphene was time dependent, at least 6 months to show a statistically significant difference.
Our review is strengthened by the detailed search strategy and the types of randomized studies included. Our review is limited by the heterogeneity among the study in the clinical intervention, and outcomes.
This systematic review provides a broader understanding of the use of Metformin and Clomiphene in the treatment of PCOS with its effects on fertility. While Metformin and Clomiphene have been shown to have a significant effect on ovulation rates vs. Clomiphene or Metformin alone, it remains unclear if Metformin alone or the addition of Metformin improves live birth rates and pregnancy.
However, as more studies are done and live birth rates are more commonly employed as the primary outcome measure, this is an area that needs to explored. Based on this systematic review, it shows a statistically significant benefit of adding Metformin to PCOS treatment regimens to help with ovulation and insulin resistance. Prior to commencing Clomiphene Citrate, patients with PCOS obese and nonobese can benefit from the use of metformin to improve ovulation rates. Metformin also seems to improve the metabolic profile of PCOS patients, thus decrasing the associated risks of having PCOS such as heart disease and diabetes mellitus. .
ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Health and fertility in World Health Organization group 2 anovulatory women.
Hum Reprod Update
Ghazeeri, G. S., Nassar, A. H., Younes, Z., & Awwad, J. T. (2012). Pregnancy outcomes and the effect of Metformin treatment in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: An overview.
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica,91
(6), 658-678. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01385.x
Dunaif A, Thomas A. Current concepts in the polycystic ovary syndrome
. Annu Rev Med
2001; 52: 401-19
Nathan, N., & Sullivan, S. (2014). The Utility of Metformin Therapy in Reproductive-Aged Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS).
Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology,15
(1), 70-83. doi:10.2174/1389201015666140330195142
Cussons, A. J., Watts, G. F., Burke, V., Shaw, J. E., Zimmet, P. Z., & Stuckey, B. G. (2008). Cardiometabolic risk in polycystic ovary syndrome: A comparison of different approaches to defining the metabolic syndrome.
(10), 2352-2358. doi:10.1093/humrep/den263
Johnson NP. Metformin use in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Ann Transl Med 2014;2(6):56. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2014.04.15
Wołczyński S, Zgliczyński W. Abnormalities of the menstrual cycle. In: Large Interna – Endocrinology. 2nd edition. Medical Tribune Poland, Warsaw 2012, 561–567
Polycystic ovarian disease (Stein-Leventhal Syndrome). (2004).
Encyclopedic Dictionary of Genetics, Genomics and Proteomics
Milewicz A. Reimbursement of Metformin for polycystic ovary syndrome.
. 2013;64(5):409–414. doi: 10.5603/EP.2013.0025
Dunaif, A.; Graf, M.; Mandeli, J.; Laumas, V.; Dobrjansky, A. Characterization of groups of hyperandrogenic women with acanthosis nigricans, impaired glucose tolerance, and/or hyperinsulinemia.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
Achard C, Thiers J
1921 Le virilisme pilaire et son association a l’insuffisance glycolytique (diabete des femmes a barb). Bull Acad Natl Med 86:51– 64
Burghen GA, Givens JR, Kitabchi AE 1980 Correlation of hyperandrogenism with hyperinsulinism in polycystic ovarian dis- ease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 50:113–116
Dunaif A, Hoffman AR 1988 Insulin resistance and hyperandrogenism: clinical syndromes and possible mechanisms. In: Pancheri P, Zichella L (eds) Biorhythms and Stress in the Physiopathology of Reproduction. Hemisphere Publishing Co, Washington, DC, pp 293–317
Barbieri RL, Ryan KJ 1983 Hyperandrogenism, insulin resistance, and acanthosis nigricans syndrome: a common endocrinopathy with distinct pathophysiologic features. Am J Obstet Gynecol 147:90
Poretsky L, Kalin MF 1987 The gonadotropic function of insulin. Endocr Rev 8:132–141
Poretsky L 1991 On the paradox of insulin-induced hyperandrogenism in insulin-resistant states. Endocr Rev 12:3–13
Book CB, Dunaif A. Selective insulin resistance in the polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999; 84: 3110–3116
Zhang G, Garmey JC, Veldhuis JD. Interactive stimulation by luteinizing hormone and insulin of the steroidogenic acute regulatory (StAR) protein and 17alpha-hydroxylase/17,20-lyase (CYP17) genes in porcine theca cells. Endocrinology 2000; 141: 2735–2742.
Nestler JE, Jakubowicz DJ. Decreases in ovarian cytochrome P450c17 alpha activity and serum free testosterone after reduction of insulin secretion in polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 617–623
Moghetti P, Castello R, Negri C et al. Insulin infusion amplifies 17-a hydroxycorticosteroid intermediates response to ACTH in hyperandrogenic women: apparent relative impairment of 17, 20-lyase activity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1996; 81: 881–886.
Thessaloniki ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group (2008) Consensus on infertility treatment related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2013;23(3):462-77.
Melo, A., Ferriani, R., & Navarro, P. (2015). Treatment of infertility in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: Approach to clinical practice.
(11), 765-769. doi:10.6061/clinics/2015(11)09
Kirpichnikov, D.; McFarlane, S.I.; Sowers, J.R. Metformin: An update.
Ann. Intern. Med.,
Velazquez EM, Mendoza S, Hamer T, Sosa F, Glueck DJ. Metformin therapy in polycystic ovary syndrome reduces hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, hyperandrogenemia, and systolic blood pressure, while facilitating normal menses and pregnancy. Metabolism 1994;43: 647–54.
Farooq, M., Alwan, Y., & Ayaz, A. (2013). Metformin-Clomiphene citrate vs. Clomiphene citrate alone: Polycystic ovarian syndrome.
Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences,6
(1), 15. doi:10.4103/0974-1208.112372
Johnson, N. P., Stewart, A. W., Falkiner, J., Farquhar, C. M., Milsom, S., Singh, V. P., . . . Buckingham, K. L. (2010). PCOSMIC: A multi-centre randomized trial in women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome evaluating Metformin for Infertility with Clomiphene.
(7), 1675-1683. doi:10.1093/humrep/deq100
Kar, S. Sanchita, S. (2013). Clomiphene citrate, Metformin or the combination of both, as first line ovulation induction drug in polycystic ovarian syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.
Fertility and Sterility,100
Legro, R. S., M.D., Barnhart, H. X., Ph.D, Schlaff, W. D., M.D., Carr, B. R., M.D., Diamond, M. P., M.D., Carson, S. A., M.D., . . . Myers, E. R., M.D., M.P.H,. (2007). Clomiphene, Metformin, or Both for Infertility in the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.
New England Journal Of Medicine,356
Meenakumari, K., Agarwal, S., Krishna, A., & Pandey, L. (2004). Effects of Metformin treatment on luteal phase progesterone concentration in polycystic ovary syndrome.
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research,37
(11), 1637-1644. doi:10.1590/s0100-879×2004001100007
Moll, E., Bossuyt, P. M., Korevaar, J. C., Lambalk, C. B., & Veen, F. V. (2006). Effect of Clomiphene citrate plus Metformin and Clomiphene citrate plus placebo on induction of ovulation in women with newly diagnosed polycystic ovary syndrome: Randomized double blind clinical trial.
(7556), 1485. doi:10.1136/bmj.38867.631551.55
Nestler, J. E., Jakubowicz, D. J., Evans, W. S., & Pasquali, R. (1998). Effects of Metformin on Spontaneous and Clomiphene-Induced Ovulation in the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey,53
(10), 621-622. doi:10.1097/00006254-199810000-00018
Neveu, N., Granger, L., Michel, P. S., & Lavoie, H. (2005). Comparison of Clomiphene Citrate (CC), Metformin or the Combination for First Line Ovulation Induction and Achievement of Pregnancy in 154 Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS).
Fertility and Sterility,84
Palomba, S., Orio, F., Falbo, A., Manguso, F., Russo, T., Cascella, T., . . . Zullo, F. (2005). Prospective Parallel Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Clomiphene Citrate and Metformin as the First-Line Treatment for Ovulation Induction in Nonobese Anovulatory Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism,90
(7), 4068-4074. doi:10.1210/jc.2005-0110
Siebert, T., Kruger, T., & Lombard, C. (2009). Evaluating the equivalence of Clomiphene citrate with and without Metformin in ovulation induction in PCOS patients.
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics,26
(4), 165-171. doi:10.1007/s10815-009-9304-z
Palomba, S., Orio, F., Falbo, A., Russo, T., Tolino, A., & Zullo, F. (2007). Clomiphene Citrate Versus Metformin as First-Line Approach for the Treatment of Anovulation in Infertile Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism,92
(9), 3498-3503. doi:10.1210/jc.2007-1009
Karimzadeh, M. A., & Javedani, M. (2010). An assessment of lifestyle modification versus medical treatment with Clomiphene citrate, Metformin, and Clomiphene citrate–Metformin in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Fertility and Sterility,94
(1), 216-220. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.078
Badawy, A., & Elnashar. (2011). Treatment options for polycystic ovary syndrome.
International Journal of Womens Health,
Sam S, Dunaif A. Polycystic ovary syndrome: syndrome XX?
Trends Endocrinol Metab
Elnashar A, Abdelmageed E, Fayed M, Sharaf M. Clomiphene cit- rate and dexamethazone in treatment of Clomiphene citrate-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome: a prospective placebo-controlled study.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH NURSING TERM PAPERS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT